Eugenics, Royalty, and Other Problematic Fantasy Tropes
Like yesterday’s post, today’s idea came from Mike Baltar. Thanks again, Mike!
Some of the feedback I received from Mike was that I went in a direction he didn’t expect yesterday. Let’s see if I can surprise him again tonight.
First Problem: Eugenics Sucks
The first definition I find for Eugenics is: The study or practice of attempting to improve the human gene pool by encouraging the reproduction of people considered to have desirable traits and discouraging or preventing the reproduction of people considered to have undesirable traits.
There is a certain appeal to modifying the gene pool to eliminate or reduce the risk of various types of cancers or terminal birth defects. Wouldn’t it be nice to eliminate diseases having a genetic component, such as Huntington’s Disease Chorea, or Cystic fibrosis? What about blindness and deafness? The starting place for eugenics always seems so noble.
It starts getting weird and problematic shortly after that. Maybe we can make it so that no one is ever color blind again. That doesn’t seem too bad. How about diabetes, asthma, and high blood pressure? Did you know that black people are more likely to get diabetes, asthma, and high blood pressure? Do you see where this is going?
The way in which the gene pool is regulated has its own set of problems, which I don’t want to get into at this point. This is about storytelling, and how including ideas like eugenics in fantasy stories comes with baggage and problems that are best left out.
For example, Rey didn’t need to be a Palpatine to be excellent. Star Wars becomes a more compelling universe when literally anyone can rise up and be the hero. One of the things great about The Last Jedi was that it said in no uncertain terms that you don’t have to be from a specific bloodline in order to have the power to stand up and fight evil. Rey came from no one, and the little nameless boy sweeping the barn at the end could use The Force. Rian Johnson was onto something there.
It’s a damn shame they had J. J. Abrams come along and ruin that message in the worst Star Wars film I’ve seen.
A good SciFi movie that makes my case that eugenics sucks is Gattaca. It’s an older movie starring Ethan Hawke and Uma Thurman, and it’s aged reasonably well. You should watch it.
Second Problem: Royalty are Colonizers
Royalty, like eugenics, goes into the idea of special bloodlines. It also embraces nepotism, and the actions of a royal protagonist is colonization at worst, gentrification at best.
Prince Hero is starting from an elevated position, a social class that doesn’t have to worry about where they’re getting their next meal. They have access to equipment, education, and are not required to work the way commoners do.
In some stories, royalty are treated almost likes gods walking the land, worshipped by the lesser people. Royalty are bowed to, and they control all the resources. They have advantages which they did not earn.
Telling a fantasy story with royalty as the antagonists makes a certain amount of sense, but some readers will read into that as being anti-government, which carries its own types of baggage.
I don’t know if it’s worth the trouble to try and make royalty work in a fantasy story. Lucas tried to jam a democratic process into Star Wars, saying that Queen Amidala was elected, but then had her be the head of state at the age of 14.
Friends, don’t make teenagers our sovereign rulers. It won’t go well for us.
Other Problematic Fantasy Tropes
Virginity is thrown into a lot of fantasy stories as being something more special than it is. A lack of sexual experience just means you’re bad at sex. It probably shouldn’t endow you with other magical properties.
When sexism shows up in fantasy story, we tend to give it a pass where we wouldn’t suffer it to exist in other genres. I think that sucks, too.
Historically, men have typically been in power in the western world, with a few exceptions. It’s usually straight, white men in power, too. Again, there are exceptions. Fantasy does not have to follow history. In fact, when you have the power to build your fantastical world any way you wish to make it, why would you as the writer shackle yourself to the history you think you know?
It’s fantasy. Craft the world you want to see.
At the very least, if you include some of these problematic tropes in your world, say something about them. Make them part of the story. If you’re including rabid patriarchy as background and not doing anything with it as part of the plot or theme, a reader might interpret the inclusion as something you support. After all, this is your fantasy.
Concluding thoughts
I’m not suggesting that you can make good assumptions about a writer simply because they have a king in their story. It’s not always that deep.
There are things we include in our stories that are unintentional or coincidental. Some elements are carried forward because it’s what we learned and we’re not thinking about it. Some things we included without putting a lot of thought put into them. And some readers are going to read things into a story that are more a reflection of themselves, rather than anything to do with the writer or the intention of their words.
Intention is key, though. I think it’s important to be as intentional with our stories as possible. Have the special power follow bloodlines if you want, but do it with intention, and try to understand what that means for the world you’re building on the whole.
Let me know if there are other problematic fantasy tropes I should have included in my list.