It would be really easy to bash on Elon Musk and the atrocious state of Twitter, which I will never refer to as “X.” If I went on such a rant, it would come from a place of deep emotion, because for a really long time, I loved Twitter. It felt like a constant afterparty I could wander through, sharing jokes and getting into light conversations with acquaintances. I met a lot of great writers through that medium, and I mourn its loss.

I’m not interested in hating on Elon, though. That’s not how I want to spend my time. And, to be fair, while I enjoyed the people I interacted with on Twitter, I have always kind of hated Twitter and social media in general. I called it The Great Mistake a couple of years ago, and I stand by that assessment.

And yet, here I am, logging into bunches of social media platforms every day. It’s junk food for the soul. It provides an illusion of connection and socialization. There is no real nutritional benefit to it, though, and in addition to the empty calories which fail to sustain me and keep me from loneliness, it is also bad for my heart as too often, it’s a source of fatty rage and diarrhetic existential dread.

I continue to connect to social media for two reasons. First, there are still people I want to stay connected with through those platforms. Second, I feel like it’s a requirement that I remain active in social media, as it’s one of the few avenues available to me to keep my stories visible to the public.

So, let’s go through the different social media platforms that I’m connected to, talk about the good, bad, and ugly, and maybe mention some of the ones I’m not connected to and why.

Twitter

I didn’t delete my account there, but I did delete all of my posts. I only log on to that platform now to check for direct messages. I will not be posting there again.

Twitter has gone through a lot of changes. The promotion of the subscription program makes people invisible when they eschew the 8 dollar badge. The badge program itself watered down identity, which opened avenues for impersonation. It is not an attractive platform for News Media at this point, and recent changes hide the text for links that go outside the site.

As far as I’m concerned, Twitter is dead. The only reason I haven’t deleted my account is because it’s my name, and if some miracle should occur and my books should take off, I don’t want someone impersonating me there. Impersonation on that platform is easier than its ever been.

It’s not a safe place. It actively allows the worst people to promote hate and bigotry, even in their advertisements. Oh, and the recent change in the terms and services describe how all the Twitter content will go into some new A.I., which is reason enough for me not to give Twitter any more of my words.

If you’re still on Twitter, do yourself a kindness and get off the platform as soon as you can.

Bluesky

The shattering of Twitter created an opportunity for bunches of other platforms to try and fill the gap. Bluesky is one of those younger platforms, and I’ve mostly been enjoying it. It satisfies the itch more than the other Twitter-clones, for some reason.

To get into Bluesky, you need an invite code. If you’re a friend of mine and you want an invite code, let me know. I have a few.

Bluesky is not perfect. It lacks some features Twitter had, and some of the bad habits developed during Twitter are still present on Bluesky. But, the culture there seems to be less about fixing on the hate and fanning the flames, and more about blocking and moving on. I appreciate that. You don’t snuff out a fire by giving it more oxygen. You can’t delegitimize hate speech by giving it more attention.

I’m not sure Bluesky will serve my author needs, but that might change over time.

Mastodon

I created an account on Mastodon many years ago, when it first popped up and Twitter already seemed like a terrible place. Mastodon is geekier and more challenging to engage with, mostly because it kind of looks like Twitter, and it smells like Twitter, but it’s underlying structure is quite a bit different.

Mastodon is not a monolithic service like Twitter or Facebook. It’s instead a whole bunch of little cities that have some interconnectivity. These cities have their own focuses, and their own culture. When you find one that suits you, you can join and you’re more likely to see other people that are within that city. At the same time, you can follow people that are in other cities.

There are fancy words like “federated” thrown around when dealing with Mastodon. It’s not quite as easy to use because of the underlying complexity, but since the different communities vary as much as they do, it’s easier to find one that you’re more likely to engage with than the platform as a whole.

People that love Mastodon really love Mastodon. I appreciate it, but I’m also not completely engaged with it. I have an account on The Wandering Shop, but very few followers.

Spoutible

If you have not heard of Spoutible, I don’t blame you. It’s one of the Twitter clones that popped up last year, I think, and it has the same look and feel as classic Twitter. Spoutible spends a lot of its time focused on what’s going on with Twitter, and how much Spoutible is better than Twitter. It is a jilted lover that is having a really hard time getting over its ex.

My presence there is even smaller than Mastodon. I’m not sure how much longer I’ll continue to log in. I don’t see it going the distance until it develops a unique voice of its own.

Facebook

I still hate Facebook. I’ve hated it for a long time, but I still go there because it’s the only way I stay in the lives of some family and some people I went to school with a long time ago.

I don’t post many original thoughts there, though I’ve been more engaged on that platform this last year. I don’t trust Zuckerberg and there is a lot about Facebook and Meta that make me upset, but at this point, I’m still logging on there and posting links to my blog.

Facebook Messenger is spyware, and I recommend that you take it off your phone if you have it installed. If you’re able to uninstall it.

We all should know by now that Facebook is generally evil, so I won’t spend any more time talking about that platform.

Reddit

I’m including Reddit here, even though it doesn’t quite fit the same mold as traditional social media. It’s mostly a place to go and follow specific topics of interest, and I enjoy it for what it is. I like the Cyberpunk and Valheim reddits. They’re fun. I should probably engage with more of the fiction reddits, but I don’t usually find that experience to be enjoyable, for some reason.

Not that long ago, Reddit changed some policies with regards to APIs, which impacted moderating, and basically made the place not good. It was a really big deal, and now I don’t see anyone talking about it. I don’t know if the changes were rolled back, or if the platform shrunk, or if people just accepted it.

I don’t spend as much time on Reddit as I used to, and I’ll probably continue to diminish my time spent there.

Instagram

I wound up with an Instagram account by accident many yeas ago, and I did absolutely nothing with it. Then I had a book coming out and it seemed like I should probably post some stuff there.

My distrust for it is the same distrust I have for Facebook. They’re the same company. But, begrudgingly, I have to admit that I’ve been having fun on Instagram lately.

Because I refuse to install any of the social media apps on my phone, I find it harder to use Instagram than most people. I have to move my pictures to my computer, then use the web app to upload my stuff. I will continue to do so, but because of the self-inflicted lack of convenience, I’ll never be super prolific on that platform.

Plus, don’t their terms of service have some draconian language about what they can do with the content posted there?

LinkedIn

This is another oddball, and I think the only reason I remain active on it is because I keep getting scouted on it, and sent emails. Everyday is another LinkedIn email or two, and I click in and check notifications.

I’m told that it’s possible to promote myself as an author there, but I’m not sure there would be much benefit to it. I don’t know.

LinkedIn is generally there to help people network and get a new job, right? I’m hoping to stay with Trimark until I can’t be a programmer anymore, so I’m not sure LinkedIn has much value to me. I haven’t posted any articles there, and I’ve only read a few, ones created and promoted by Trimark.

TikTok

I do not have an account on TikTok and I don’t use it. It’s another one that sort of demands the app on the phone, so it’s unlikely I’ll ever create a TikTok account and engage there. It’s possible that I’m making a mistake, because I hear that “BookTok” is a real thing.

I don’t know. It seems like a platform for a younger audience. I don’t think that the people enjoying TikTok are going to be particularly interested in short videos by an old like me.

Threads

Threads was Facebooks attempt at a Twitter clone, and it is tied heavily to one’s Instagram account. I would have checked it out, except there was no web client. Since I’m never going to install the app on my phone, I will never engage with Threads.

As I understand it, Threads had a tremendous intake of people, then immediately lost the vast majority of them. I don’t know anyone that is currently using Threads.

One of the interesting things about Threads was that they said they were going to be accessible through the Mastodon federation, which means I would eventually be able to follow some Threads users through my Mastodon account. I thought that was pretty cool.

Now, since it doesn’t seem like anyone is using the platform, I’m not sure federation even matters. I’m not sure if they’re still planning on developing that feature. So, Threads is effectively dead to me.

In Conclusion…

There’s not much else for me to say about social media that I haven’t said before. Across the board, it’s not healthy for any of us. It’s still The Great Mistake. I’m still engaged with a lot more of it than I like.

But what else am I going to do? Work on my stories?

Yesterday, we talked about villains. Tonight, let’s talk about heroes. Like last night, I’ll list a few samples, then break them into categories of my own making. Within each of these categories, I’ll offer some humble tips on how to write heroes of that type.

The list of heroes that come to mind:

• Luke Skywalker
• Frodo Baggins
• Rand Al’Thor
• Superman
• Indiana Jones
• Harry Dresden

Hmm. Now that I look at this list, I see that it’s quite a sausage fest. For our purposes, I’m not sure that matters, since I’m really only focusing on types of characters, and gender doesn’t matter at that level. We can easily swap in Wonder Woman for Superman, and Laura Croft for Indiana Jones.

Iconic Heroes

Speaking of Superman, Wonder Woman, Indiana Jones, and Laura Croft, all four of them are examples of iconic heroes. Iconic heroes are characters that don’t change very much over time. They end the story just as heroic as they started it. These characters are ideal for serialized storytelling. Because they go through a minimal amount of development, the reader or viewer can follow the current story without having to go through a deep backlog.

Iconic heroes can have an arc within the story, but the ideal story for an iconic character is plot driven, rather than character driven. Like the Embodiment of Evil characters described last night, Iconic characters can be on the thin side. But that’s okay. We still love them and will follow them on their adventures, because the adventure is the point.

Reluctant Heroes / Campbell’s Heroes

The reluctant hero is your farmhand-turned-sword master that initially resist the call to action. This is the character that stars in your Campbell’s Hero’s Journey. Luke Skywalker and Rand al’Thor and basically every character to participate on the aforementioned Hero’s Journey can be classified as a Reluctant Hero. Do remember James Kirk from J. J. Abram’s reboot of Star Trek? That was a Reluctant Hero.

Writing a Reluctant Hero is not that difficult, since there are so many examples in fiction to follow. The key is to map out the journey the hero will take, and write someone that will believably follow the path. Luke desperately wanted to be a hero, but was loyal to his family and his duties on the farm. Rand dreamed of adventure, but was loyal to his father and his duties on the farm. The Reluctant Hero generally has the qualities of a hero within them, and its those qualities — loyal, dutiful — are the things that hold them back when adventure first comes to call.

Everyman Heroes

Frodo is the perfect example of the Everyman Hero. He’s generally willing to do what must be done, but he isn’t particularly endowed with the qualities of a hero. He is relatable, and a perfect stand-in for the reader or viewer.

This is where I would slot Harry Dresden as well, even though he starts off gifted with magic. In personality, he is relatively normal. I almost slotted him in with the Iconic Heroes, but I believe Dresden changes over the course of the books, which is not usually something that happens to Iconic Heroes.

Mel Walker from The Repossessed Ghost is also an Everyman Hero, in my opinion. He quickly develops psychic abilities, but in personality, he’s just a young man in a world that’s way bigger than him, and he’s doing his best. Even more than Dresden, Mel Walker changes over time.

To write an Everyman character, focus on the character’s voice. Develop someone that is not too cowardly nor too brave or exceedingly competent. This should be someone that the reader can measure themselves against.

In Summary…

All characters are the heroes of their own story. Some of those stories aren’t particularly interesting, which is why they aren’t the star of the book. But every character should have the illusion of depth, if not true dimensionality. That security guard over there? He keeps touching his vest pocket, as that’s where he put the folded up picture of a dinosaur that his daughter gave him this morning before he came in to work. It sure would be a shame if something happened to him. See that bank teller? She keeps adjusting her glasses because they’re her old prescription. She’s too embarrassed to admit what happened to her current glasses, but she’s also chewing a lot of gum to hide the alcohol on her breath, so maybe it isn’t that big a mystery, after all.

Protagonists come in all shapes and sizes, and the three types I listed above are really just scratching the surface. Character driven stories demand interesting and engaging characters, and they may defy being categorized. That’s a good thing.

The key to writing a good protagonist is to give them wants and needs, and enough drive to pursue those wants and needs. A good protagonist will move the story forward through their decisions.

A few nights ago, I wrote about writing women characters. If you don’t have time to read it, the sentence summary is just write a male character and give them a female name. Or another way of saying it, focus more on writing the character than writing a woman. Similar thoughts apply to writing villains, too.

Before I get too far into the villain conversation, I have a brief follow-up to the writing women post. I didn’t really talk about descriptions, even though I started the post with a reference to “breasting boobily.” The follow-up is: over-applying descriptions to your women over your men is a way of drawing attention to the gender of the character, which you know, might not be cool. Treat your characters equally, regardless of their imagined gender.

Women characters deserve to be defined by their actions. As I said in the other post, women should be able to have noble deaths. Furthermore, they should be allowed to be menacing villains on par with their male counterparts.

So now let’s talk about villains.

Villains come in different shapes and sizes. Here’s a list of some villains, in no particular order:

• Darth Vader
• Macbeth
• Zuko from the start of Avatar: The Last Airbender
• Emperor Palpatine
• Lore from Star Trek: The Next Generation
• Ursula from The Little Mermaid
• Dr. Doom
• Magneto
• Annie Wilkes from Stephen King’s Misery
• Killmonger from the movie Black Panther
• The Joker from Batman: The Dark Knight

There are many others I could mention, but this seems like a good, eclectic list. Some of them have quite a bit in common with each other, and some stand out on their own. A couple of them are my favorites, for different reasons.

I’m not going to belabor this by talking about what a villain is. Instead, I want to break this list into different categories, and talk about what makes these characters work within those categories, and what it takes to write them.

Embodiment of Evil

The Embodiment of Evil villain type includes irredeemable characters that strain believability. Star Wars has a lot of these villains in Palpatine, Darth Maul, Snoke, and even Darth Vader throughout Episode 4. Depending on who is writing him, Dr. Doom might sneak into this category, though I think the best Dr. Doom stories are the ones where he is more nuanced.

That’s the thing about Embodiment of Evil characters. They serve the simple purpose of being bad guys, without a lot of depth or nuance at all. They don’t need it. There usually isn’t a lot of difference between any of these types of character. Palpatine and Scar from The Lion King may have more lines than Darth Maul, but we don’t get a lot about what makes them tick or why they are motivated to be evil.

How do you write one of these characters? Don’t think too hard about it. To pull off a proper Embodiment of Evil, the character should have a strong presence. Anton Chigurh from No Country for Old Men may not have an impressive costume, skull horns, or glowing red eyes, but there is no doubt that he has an overpowering presence on par with that of Darth Maul.

Embodiment of Evil characters do terrible things on screen or on the page, and we usually see them through other characters. If we sympathize with the characters that are witnessing these monsters, we can empathize with their fear, which is the key to making these Embodiments of Evil characters terrifying.

These characters are generally pretty easy to come up with. The challenge to writing these characters well is conveying the effect they have on the other people around them.

Bad Guys with a Message

The Bad Guy with a Message can often look like an Embodiment of Evil. The difference is that they have just a little bit more depth and motivation.

Heath Ledger’s Joker is a perfect example. In that movie, Alfred sums him up: some people just want to watch the world burn. We are given multiple explanations for The Joker being the way he is, which is chilling because these explanations are contradictory. There is implied depth but no definitive backstory, making him even more an agent of chaos. For all his chaos, he executes elaborate plans, all in an effort to say something about human nature: we’re all just one bad day from being monsters like him. He ultimately fails in that movie not because Batman beats him up, but because the people on the boats refuse to act in the way he predicts, thus refuting his entire message.

Anne Wilkes doesn’t have much of a message, but we see her motivation. She’s a reader that would never let a single profanity slip from her sweet lips, and a fan so driven and attached to a set of characters that she’s willing to torture the writer in order to get him to write the next book. She is the darkest muse. If not for the explicit motivation spelled out, giving her a little bit of depth, she would be an Embodiment of Evil.

That is the first clue on how to write one of these characters. The Joker and Anne Wilkes both have the presence and terror of an Embodiment of Evil, but they’re distinct in that they are highly motivated. Motivated characters are beloved, even when they’re villains. Sometimes, especially when their villains.

Broken Moral Compass

The Broken Moral Compass character is probably my favorite. Like the Bad Guy with a Message, they are highly motivated. They’re living in a world that from their perspective, is wrong in a specific and infuriating way, and they are driven to act out and solve it.

Magneto is a Broken Moral Compass character. He’s intelligent and compassionate. He cares deeply for mutant kind, even those that stand out as his enemies. The evil he does is in the name of preserving mutants and elevating them.

Good Dr. Doom stories paint him with a similar brush. And another Marvel character on my list, Killmonger, has a moral compass so close to being correct that if he hadn’t burned the heart-shaped herb, he might have been the hero of that story.

It seems like Marvel really likes the Broken Moral Compass character type. An argument could be made that Thanos and Loki fall into this category, too.

To write a Broken Moral Compass character, you must look at the world you’re creating through a unique perspective. Take something that your heroes hold to be true and important and turn it upside down.

The Broken Moral Compass character is ultimately the hero in their own story. The hero in their own mind, though they might not admit it. Like the Bad Guy with a Message, the Broken Moral Compass character is highly motivated, to the point that their motivation defines them.

Dark Reflection

The Dark Reflection character is one that mirrors or highlights qualities of one or more of your heroes. Lore from Star Trek is a Dark Reflection of Data. What if Data traded in his decency and conscience for emotions? Ursula is a Dark Reflection of Ariel’s father, King Triton.

The Dark Reflection character is more derivative than the Broken Moral Compass. In some stories, Magneto is essentially written as a Dark Reflection of Professor Xavier.

To write a Dark Reflection character, pick one of your favorite, most flavorful heroes, and invert them in some way. You still need to do all the work to make them work as a character. The Dark Reflection character is usually deeper than the Embodiment of Evil characters, but not always.

Doomed with Knowledge

The Doomed with Knowledge character used to be my favorite type, and I’m still very fond of them. These are characters that would have been the hero, if not for some piece of information given to them when they weren’t ready for it.

If Macbeth had not been given the prophecy that he would be king, would he have still killed his best friend and taken the crown? Would Lady Macbeth egged him on to do it if he hadn’t shared knowledge of the prophecy with her? Macbeth was a hero right up to the point where he became the villain.

Would Anakin Skywalker still turn into Darth Vader if he wasn’t told that he was the one prophesied to bring balance to The Force? That probably played a part in his downfall. Would he have turned to the Dark Side if he had not been plagued with visions of Padme dying? He closed the loop on that vision because in turning to the Dark Side and assaulting her in his anger, she probably wouldn’t have died in child birth.

I like Anakin for another reason, because looking at Phantom Menace, he was doomed by the Jedi Council’s lack of knowledge. When asked how he felt, he answered, “cold, sir.” Yet Yoda took that as a sign of Dark Side influence, when really, the kid was used to the heat from his desert world.

I think Boromir also qualifies as a Doomed with Knowledge character. He knew where The One Ring was, and he knew that it was powerful, perhaps something that could be used to save his people. Had he not bore such knowledge, I don’t think The Ring would have been able to find purchase within his mind to tempt him.

To write a Doomed with Knowledge character, write a hero, and then give them some temptation they cannot resist. Doomed with Knowledge characters are best when they are deep and pitiable. You have done well when the reader can imagine how they might have turned out if only they had the strength to resist temptation. Preferably, a temptation that the reader can appreciate and sympathize with.

The Redeemable

The Redeemable character is essentially the complete opposite to The Embodiment of Evil. Where an Embodiment of Evil is thin, The Redeemable is deep, complex, motivated, and nuanced. The Redeemable can do terrible, evil things, but they usually aren’t kicking puppies for fun or acting without a conscience.

Let’s look briefly at Zuko from The Last Airbender.

Zuko is tasked with hunting down and killing Aang in order to reclaim his honor. That’s all he’s ever wanted, really. He sets off on a dangerous journey, serving the man that claimed his honor and deeply scarred him when Zuko didn’t deserve it.

Zuko is a survivor of abuse. He acts on his emotions. He’s impulsive, driven, and young.

Over the course of his adventures, he learns and he grows. He finds that he and Aang aren’t so different, and that they could be friends if they weren’t on opposite sides of an ongoing conflict. And through the love and patience of his Uncle, he learns his own worth, and that the honor he always wanted was his all along.

Zuko is one of the best written characters, pretty much ever, and he started as a villain. I don’t think that’s a coincidence.

In spite what we see in Return of the Jedi, I don’t believe that Darth Vader falls into this category. He gets some redemption, but I do not believe he is actually redeemed. He killed too many younglings.

If you want to learn how to write a Redeemable character, go watch the animated series Avatar: The Last Airbender. Even if you don’t want to learn to write this type of character, go watch that series anyway. It’s excellent storytelling and a good time all around.

In Summary…

I prefer nuanced, interesting characters. However, not every story needs the villain to be that deep. Palpatine was a perfectly serviceable villain in the original trilogy. Darth Maul in The Phantom Menace served his purpose, too, and he basically didn’t have any lines.

Look at your story and determine how important the relationship is between your protagonist and your antagonist. If it’s important, your story may be better served with a villain that is deeper and more interesting than someone that just laughs and twirls their mustache.

One of the reasons I’m doing the blog challenge this year is so that I will be ready for Nano in November. Every time I have been successful in Nanowrimo, it’s been after a successful Blogtober.

The book I want to write (at least get a good start on) is the sequel novel to The Repossessed Ghost. It’s a story I’ve been thinking about for almost 10 years.

With that much forethought, you’d think I’d be more prepared than I am.

At this point, I just have a collection of ideas. There is a couple of characters I want to introduce that I think are going to be a blast to write. There will be more travel in Mel’s future. Compared to The Repossessed Ghost, the sequel is going to be a bit more involved, and a little bit bigger in scope.

I still want to keep it light and fun to read. But I want to reward readers that pay close attention. There are some details I’m prepared to sow into this story that should make it extremely satisfying to people that read stories the way I do.

I’ve learned so much since I wrote the first book. I’m not too worried about it, but I do wonder if I’ll be able to capture the same tone and humor of The Repossessed Ghost.

Without going into spoilers, most of the characters from the first book will be returning in the second. I touch on most of the characters in the short story I mentioned yesterday, but we don’t really see much of them. I want to expand their stories in the second novel.

When I first started writing The Repossessed Ghost, I didn’t have a title. I just called it The Mel Walker Story and eventually, while I was reading one of the drafts to Melissa, the jokey title came to me and stuck. I imagine something like that will happen with the sequel novel.

With the first book, I didn’t exactly work from an outline. I used the flashlight approach, which I’ll talk about later this month. For the sequel, I want to have a good, solid outline. I’m more comfortable with outlines than I was 10 years ago. Also, this story is going to be more complicated. The only way I’m going to be able to keep track of all of it while putting it together is to establish timelines and the order of events before hand, which means working from an outline.

I was talking to Mike Baltar about what it is to write a Mel Walker story. With a mystery, the characters are gathering clues in order to figure out who did the crime, and why. A Mel Walker story is sort of like a mystery turned inside out. Because Mel can do what he does, he can quickly learn the end of the mystery. Hand him the murder weapon and he’ll pull a vision off of it that will not only show him who committed the crime, but what was going on their head. That’s powerful.

A Mel Walker story is more about discovering the journey along the way. It’s about figuring out what to do with information that no one else has. In Mel Walker’s world, the police aren’t just going to take a psychic’s word for anything. And, like what happened in The Repossessed Ghost, if Mel isn’t careful, he’ll draw unwanted attention to himself. From the perspective of the authorities, how else can Mel know so much about the crime if he wasn’t the one that committed it?

I like these stories. I like telling them, and I think they’re unique and fresh.

A common compliment I’ve received about The Repossessed Ghost is that it is very easy to read, that it hooks the audience, and keeps them turning pages all the way to the end. I need to recapture that essence in the sequel. Spin City is a slower story that builds gradually over time. Synthetic Dreams is a more cerebral story, that keeps the reader interested, but it isn’t an adventure the way The Repossessed Ghost is. That’s what I need to accomplish in the sequel. Get in with both feet running, and keep things light and engaging from beginning to end.

I think I can do that.

The more I think about it, the more excited I am for November, when I get to actually start. Until then, I have a lot of prep work to do.

Yesterday, I attended the Shut Up & Write mini marathon, which takes place the first Saturday of every month, and I accomplished two things. First, I wrote my 7th blog post for the month. Second, I added another thousand words to my short story, which is a follow-up to The Repossessed Ghost.

If you read The Repossessed Ghost, you might have noticed that there is a lot of potential for stories in that world. I’m looking forward to exploring some of those possibilities in the sequel. For this short story, I’m focusing on something relatively small. A bit more than a day-in-the-life, but not much larger. What would it be like if a psychic like Mel Walker was called to serve on a jury?

As a psychic, Mel is able to talk to ghosts, look into the past, and get visions off of objects he touches, experiencing significant events that took place involving the object. With these abilities, he can truly know what happened at a crime scene. He doesn’t have to worry about “reasonable doubt.”

So what happens if the case presented in the court doesn’t match the reality of the event, and Mel is the only one that knows the truth?

I’m really enjoying this story. It’s a little bit longer than I expected so far. I might be able to edit it and trim it some, but I think it’s going to wrap up at just under 15,000 words. That’s novelette territory. It might be too long for the market we were planning for it.

Or, it might be a perfect length, and I shouldn’t worry about it just yet. I’ll worry about the length after I submit it.

It’s a fun story, with some interesting twists and turns that I don’t think anyone is going to see coming.

I don’t explicitly give the year that The Repossessed Ghost takes place, but if you check the foreword, I make it relatively clear that it’s set in 2013. A remarkable number of things have changed in just 10 years, and I’m not sure people have noticed. Ten yeas ago, cell phones weren’t quite as ubiquitous. Ten years ago, marijuana laws were still strict across the country. These are minor points, but they were lightly touched on by the story, which ages it somewhat.

The Psychic on the Jury is set just a few years after The Repossessed Ghost. The short story doesn’t spoil the novel, but it does lightly touch on some things we learn in the first couple of chapters.

I’m really looking forward to this short story being available in the world. I’m not sure when that’ll be, but I’m having a blast writing a sequel story.

It’s not the sequel. I’ll talk more about that tomorrow. This is more of an appetizer. And I’m really glad I’ve been able to make some progress on it recently. I feel like I’ve been dragging this one out forever.

If all goes as planned, the first draft of The Psychic on the Jury will be finished before the end of the month.

And on the 7th day, he wrote entirely about himself, because his ego has grown out of control. What an asshole.

I have no idea why I thought this would be an interesting topic. My life is interesting, but not at the day-to-day level. This might be a good cap on the theme of the last few days, where I’ve gone deep into what it’s like to be an author. Or it might be an egotistical exercise that none of us will enjoy. Who can say?

Today is Saturday, and not the greatest example or what my days are typically like. I’m attending a Shut Up & Write marathon. When it’s done, I may go tinker with my mail server to make sure emails are actually going out. I’m not convinced they are.

Instead of describing today, I will describe a more typical day.

It’s Monday morning. The alarm is going off on my phone at 7AM. I either stayed up way too late the night before, or I slept poorly. I always sleep poorly. I can’t blame it on the bed anymore. There’s something wrong with me, and though I have authorization from my insurance company to have a sleep study performed, I still haven’t made the call to see it through. I fumble with my phone to hit the snooze. I don’t have to start my work day until 8AM, and I’m not going into the office today. I can sleep a few more minutes.

I’m up. It’s dangerously close to the time I should be in front of my computer, working. My eyes aren’t working right. There’s gunk in them, and there’s crud in my lungs. When I talk, I sound like a smoker. I believe this is because we slept with the fan running all night again, but without the fan, Melissa roasts. The morning crud will pass, and my eyes will focus better in a few minutes. Just need to hack and cough a bit, and then I’ll be fine.

I’m in my office. It used to be my daughter’s room, and I fixed it up after she moved out. It’s now the room in the house that is most inviting to me. I try to make it inviting to others, too, but it’s small. I hit the KVM switch to turn back to the work laptop. I feel like I’m running late, now.

The work is there waiting for me, and it is impatient. I have to start using my brain immediately. There are problems only I can solve, which is strange, because I’ve spent the last 3 or 4 years teaching other people how to do what I do, but it doesn’t stick. It’s not because I’m a bad teacher, or they’re bad students. I think it’s a combination of factors. First, I have a long and detailed memory. Second, I have a higher-than-usual attention to detail, Third, my loyalty to Trimark is unmatched, and I see the problems from a different perspective than other people. I will do whatever it takes to make Trimark successful. Finally, it’s much, much easier to leave some of the problems for me to fix, and the shortest route to a resolution is the one most taken.

Not all of my work is reactive. It seems like everything is on fire, all the time, but that’s not true. I have some opportunities to work on new things, but we’re not currently focused on the things I need to design. We’re focused on something else, and we’re constantly going a route that I disagree with. But I keep it to myself, because… well, I might be wrong. I’m rarely wrong about these sorts of things, but if I’m right, we can still recover. If I’m wrong, it’s better that I remain silent and not make myself a disruption to the team.

I have a team, by the way. I’ve been a manager for a little while now, and there are aspects about the job that I really like. I like looking out for my people, giving them what they need in order to succeed. This sounds strange, but I used to run raids when I was playing World of Warcraft, and my favorite part of running those raids was seeing a bunch of different people come together and coordinate. I felt like a conductor, and the people in my raid were an orchestra, making something greater than the some of its parts. I get the same sort of feeling when managing. I suspect I might be a very good manager, but it’s hard for me to tell.

Melissa has most likely brought me something to eat, because I forgot to feed myself. I am very thankful. I hope she knows how thankful I am. She’s trying to take care of me.

There is something about the grind of the day that makes me careless of my own health. I have to force myself to get up and walk around the house, from time to time. Some days, good days, I go for a long walk around the neighborhood. If I’m going to keep my blood pressure in check, I need to exercise more and not just reduce my salt. Did I remember to check my blood pressure this morning? Shit.

We’re getting towards the end of the work day. Time has flown by in a blink. I have helped a bunch of different people at work with various problems, and I need to record all of that. We have changed the way we do things, and there is a micromanagement element to time tracking that grates on me. And I’m absolutely terrible at it. I would much rather remain focused on the moment, giving people the answers they need. Was it a replication issue I helped with earlier? Who was it that called me when I was in the middle of that Flexible Logic Controller issue? I have to record everything I’ve done today, and I’m going to do a terrible job of it and get yelled at again. This is the one aspect of my job I hate. It’s the thing that has me referring to my work as “Day Job” instead of Trimark. If I leave or get fired, the time tracking will be the catalyst.

It is 5PM and I can’t keep my eyes open. There is a tiny couch in my room. I’ll just lay my head down for a few minutes. A thirty minute power nap, and I’ll be ready to work on something that nourishes my soul, rather than fill a time bucket to be turned in for money.

It’s 6:30PM. So much for a thirty minute power nap. My neck is sore and I feel groggy and out of sorts. I feel more tired than I did when I laid down for a nap, but if I go to sleep now, my schedule is going to be even more messed up than it usually is. Besides, wasn’t there something else I was supposed to be doing tonight?

Melissa and I make dinner happen. If it’s a really good night, we work on it together in the kitchen. If it’s a bad night, we order in. Melissa enjoys cooking way more than I do, and she thinks I’m pickier than I am. Tonight, she makes something that involves ground turkey and noodles and tomatoes. She’s really helping me watch my salt.

Somehow, it’s 8:30PM. I’m in my office again. I want to write, but I can’t find the threads to my story. There’s something about the work day that’s still bothering me. I watch some YouTube videos. I check Discord and see if any of my friends are around. Maybe we’ll play some games.

It’s Monday night, so the garbage has to go out to the curb.

If it’s a good night, I succeed in writing a blog post, and maybe work a little bit on a short story that I’ve been dragging out for months. If it’s a fair night, I have enough energy to play a video game. If it’s a bad night, there is a long-running video playing in the background while I play solitaire. I have reached the point with solitaire that I don’t have to think anymore. I don’t want to think. I’m listening to something, maybe it’s a D&D game on Dropout.tv. I want to play in a roleplaying game, but there aren’t really any invites coming my way for that, and I don’t have the time or energy to make a game happen myself. I don’t have the time or energy to do anything. I’m just mindlessly moving digital cards, sitting, doing nothing. Feeling like I can’t do anything. There’s no fuel left to feed the fire.

The sound of the TV in my bedroom has finally diminished. Melissa likes these horrible drama shows, like Married at First Site. I can’t stand them. It’s the worst people, doing terrible things, and being terrible to each other. It depresses me.

It’s almost midnight. Or it might be a little after midnight. I intended to come to bed over an hour ago, but I lost track of time. Maybe I should set an alarm to tell me to go to bed? There were a lot of things I wanted to do tonight, and I don’t think I did even half of them. I might not have done any of them. I go to bed, and I try to sleep, but I have this dread about the next day to come.

If I don’t find a way out of this cycle…

Anyway.

That’s a relatively typical week day. Looking back over it, it reads like a horror story. I don’t think that’s what I intended when I added this topic to my list.

Tomorrow will be more fun, because I get to talk fiction.

There’s a podcast for writers that is pretty neat. Actually, there are lots of them, and if you’ve been following me for any period of time, you might think I’m about to mention Writing Excuses. I love Writing Excuses, but tonight’s podcast (and marketplace) is Small Publishing in a Big Universe. Steven Radecki wrote a presentation in association with SPBU which talks about the various ways to publish. I can’t find a public link to his presentation, so I’ll just talk about the subject myself, and hope I do it justice.

Edit: Steven has given me this link, which has this other link to the presentation I was thinking of. Similar subject, but presented from a different perspective.

When talking about publishing a story, there are three main routes:

1. Self Publishing
2. Small Publisher/Independent Publisher
3. Traditional Publisher/Big Five

There are probably a couple of other routes I could mention, such as academic publishing, but the other routes aren’t common or accessible for authors writing fiction. Sure, publishing a puff piece in a newspaper can be full of fictitious content, but we’re concerning ourselves tonight with books and short stories.

Self Publishing

You finished a book, and now you want people to read it. Just post it to Amazon and watch the money roll in, right? After all, you’ve spent six whole weeks working on this first draft, and after all that time, we wanna get paid.

Slow up, Flash. Take a deep breath, and maybe a step back from a bad decision.

Self publishing is absolutely a viable route, but there are things you should know and do before throwing the manuscript over the fence. You’re starting a business, and you’re generating a product. You are responsible for everything, and it’s important to know exactly what you’re responsible for.

Editing

You need an editor. It’s possible you don’t think you need an editor, but trust me, you do. Everyone does. You have been staring at your pile of words longer than anyone, and in the process, you have become blind to your own mistakes. Have you ever stopped in one of those rural areas that’s close to cattle, and when you get out of the car, your nose is assaulted with an odor strong enough to turn your stomach? The locals appear unaffected. They’ve become acclimated and don’t notice the stink. When it comes to your manuscript, you’re a local, and the smell is wafting off of your unedited story.

There are different types of editing, and you may need all of it. There is developmental editing, which goes deep into the content of your story and helps shape it into something that actually makes sense. Structural editing may be part of this, which reshapes the story so that it flows well and follows a coherent style. There is line and copy editing, which may deal with spelling and punctuation, but usually deals with grammar, word choice, and overall enhancements to the writing quality. Then there is mechanical editing, which is all about spelling, grammar, punctuation, and formatting. Depending on the editor, some of these types of editing passes are included together, or they may require additional work by other editors.

Have you written about someone with a disability when you yourself are not disabled in that way? Have you written about someone that is gay while you are straight, black while you are white, a victim of domestic violence that you have never experienced, or some other marginalized identity that does not apply to you? Chances are, you could use a sensitivity reader. Sensitivity readers aren’t necessarily editors. They don’t even have to be writers. They’re subject matter experts on their lives, and if they tell you that what you have written is harmful, you need to listen to them and make appropriate corrections in your story. Also, pay your sensitivity readers. It’s hazard pay. By reading your story, they’re taking a chance and exposing themselves to trauma.

Cover Art

Your cover is the first thing prospective readers will see, and they will use it to judge your book. Unless you’re a visual artist, you’re going to need someone that can dress up your book and make it look good. Maybe you’re like me, and you’ve never been swayed or put off by a cover. You and I may be rare, because there are lots of people that will look at the cover and if it doesn’t appeal to them, they won’t buy it.

Maybe your daughter is an artist, and you figure you can save some money by having her make the cover for your book. My daughter is also an artist, and as sweet as it would be to work together on a project, she’s never created a book cover before, so she has no idea what to do about dimensions, formatting for the spine, or any of the other things that experienced cover artists know. She could learn, but is her art style even a good match for the story?

A professional cover artist is worth paying for. They will work with you, and will probably ask questions you’ve never thought to ask. Niki Lenhart, the artist that created the cover for The Repossessed Ghost, created multiple versions before we landed on the one that I loved. Niki had to endure my inexperience and indecisiveness in order to come up with what I think is the perfect cover for my story. Your cover artist is going to have to deal with your idiosyncrasies, too, so pay them what they deserve. They will literally make or break your book.

Marketing

You’re responsible for getting the word out. Do you have a social media presence? You’re probably going to want one, but keep your expectations in check; social media does not translate into very many sales.

Professional conferences, blog guest spots, features in other people’s newsletters… there’s a lot of frustrating work in front of you, just to spread the word that your story exists. And there are no guarantees.

Remember: Amazon will not promote your story unless it is already selling. How do you get the sales? Friend, if there was an easy answer to this question, we would all be doing it.

Why Self-Publish?

The main reason an author will self publish is control. They have complete authority over every aspect of their book and their career. They can hire whatever editor or artist they want to, that they can afford. They may try their hand at doing it all themselves, though most people lack the skills necessary, and will only generate mediocrity.

Also, when you self-publish, you don’t have to share the profits with anyone. Well… the printing and distribution will still take their cut. And of course you had to hire people in order to make your story shine. And there might have been some other costs incurred while trying to market your book. But other than that, you get all of the profits!

Small Publisher/Independent Publisher

This is the route I have gone with The Repossessed Ghost, and it has been ideal for me. I looked into self-publishing for years before I found Water Dragon Publishing. I looked at all the skills required to start a successful business and determined that, while I could learn everything necessary, I’d rather most of my time be spent actually writing.

Editing

Your publisher should have at least one editor to work with you on your story. Just bear in mind that the resources of a small publisher are dependent on how small they are. Your story might have been scrutinized by a development editor during the submission process, so if it looks like it will be painful or expensive to work on your story, you might not get accepted at all.

The theme throughout this whole section is that a small publisher is small, so their resources are limited. If you have a problem working with the first editor you’re assigned to, there may not be a second editor to turn to.

You’re not on your own like you are when self-publishing. However, you will be well served to pay extra attention during this process. Your attention to detail may be the deciding factor as to whether or not your book is successful.

Cover Art

Your publisher should put you in touch with a cover artist. Again, resources may be limited. If you know a cover artist that you’d like to work with, you might approach your publisher and see if something can be worked out.

Small publishers are always looking for talented people they can work with, that do reliable work at an affordable rate.

Marketing

From what I can tell, marketing is the biggest difference between the small and big publishers. Again, with a small publisher, resources are limited. They are not going to have the same kind of reach as The Big Five. With a small publisher, it is unlikely that your books will show up in Barnes & Noble.

Your publisher should have some markets that they will submit your book to, but just like with self publishing, a lot of the promotion is going to be on your shoulders.

There are still no guarantees, and everyone is looking for that magic spell that will summon all the readers to buy their book. There is no magic, though. Only luck.

Why Work with a Small Publisher?

As Steven writes in his presentation, independent publishing is self publishing. Much of the pros and cons of self publishing are still present, but you’re no longer having to weather the storm alone.

Consider a group of self publishing writers that have been managing their businesses for a while. They know what they’re doing, but each of them possess different strengths and weaknesses. After a fortuitous meeting, they determine that the best thing they can do is pool their resources and work together. That’s small publishing.

What I have found with Water Dragon is a community of like-minded and talented writers. That appeals to me.

I haven’t had to pay for editing services or a cover artist. I also share profits on the individual sales with the publisher. The percentage of the pie I get is larger than if I was working with a big publisher.

One of the deciding factors for me was that small publishers will touch genres that big publishers aren’t buying. The Repossessed Ghost is a good story that deserved to be in the world, but since my name isn’t Jim Butcher or Ilona Andrews, The Big Five was never going to give my story a shot.

Traditional Publisher/Big Five

If you want the largest audience possible, you’re going to have to publish with The Big Five. The Big Five are:

• Penguin Random House
• Hachette
• HarperCollins
• Macmillan
• Simon & Schuster

You may have heard recently about the buying and selling of Simon & Schuster. Penguin Random House almost bought them, but instead, a private equity firm, KKR, bought it. I believe this is the same firm that bought Toys R Us. So, who knows if there will be a “Big Five” for much longer.

Let’s break this down the way I broke down the other options.

Editing

Everyone wants to see your book succeed, and there is a budget to make sure that happens. Of course, if you’re a new writer, that budget might be extremely small. The Big Five have battalions of editors at their disposal, but if you are paired with one early on that doesn’t share your vision, you could be in for a wild and bumpy ride.

The publisher should do their best to accommodate you and make you comfortable. But, there have been nightmare stories.

You need to remember that it is your name on the cover, and you need to make sure that the book passes through the editing process and comes out on the other side as something that you can be proud of. You need to have the confidence and wherewithal to call out problems, and you need to do it in such a way that you’re not “rocking the boat.” Be professional and assertive.

Cover Art and Marketing

With the Big Five, Cover Art and Marketing go together. In fact, the title of your book is a marketing decision, too.

If my Mel Walker story had been picked up by one of the random penguins, would it still have been called The Repossessed Ghost? It’s hard to say. I remember an executive editor for one of the publishers telling me the name sounded clunky. I think the name fits, but someone in marketing might have come up with something that would make it sell.

I also know that marketing is my weakest subject, so having a marketing budget and experts helping me make decisions like that would have been a huge boon.

Marketing is the advantage Big Publishers have over Small Publishers. From my perspective, it might be the only real advantage that matters.

The Issues with Big Publishers

I’m not going to go into the reasons why working with a Big Publisher is good, because they’re too obvious. Yes, you’ll get a smaller percentage off of every sale, but the numbers dwarf what you’ll get when going out on your own or working with an independent publisher.

Before you can work with the Big Five, you need an agent. You might be able to get an offer through an acquiring editor, but those are rare, and even when it happens, the publisher will still want to work through an agent.

The agent relationship will be one of the most important in your life, and is worth its own post. Your agent is going to be pivotal to your entire career. Having a bad agent is worse than having no agent at all.

The main problem with Big Publishers is that they bank on what they predict will be guaranteed wins. They put their budget towards already established authors. New authors are not as well supported or funded, which makes it harder for them to succeed.

Big Publishers will abandon stories or authors if the sales are not what they expect. They do not always consider factors outside the author’s control, such as Donald Trump getting elected in 2016, or a global pandemic driving everyone indoors in 2020.

It is extremely difficult to get in with the big publishers, and it seems like a precarious place to be if you don’t become a household name. Most people do not become household names.

No one really knows what they’re doing, but The Big Five think they do. They have some of the answers, for sure, but the process is flawed.

Consider how Harry Potter came to be. It was turned down 12 times before getting picked up by Bloomsbury in the UK. As I understand it, an editor’s daughter loved the book and was the first advocate for it. Whatever your feelings about J.K. Rowling, Harry Potter was an extraordinarily successful series. The Big Publishing filter would never have let it see the light of day.

Final Thoughts

Only you can determine what your career should look like. I know successful and happy authors that are completely self published. I also am well acquainted with many successful writers that work with The Big Five. Every author is different, and every author walks a slightly different path than the rest.

Regardless of how you publish, you will need patience. If you get a book deal with The Big Five, it could be a couple of years before you actually see it in print. Small publishers can move faster, but it’s not guaranteed. And as I alluded to at the beginning, when you self publish, you can go as fast as you want, but you may not be well served rushing.

Last night, I tried to establish that the careers of authors are as varied as the authors themselves. Most of us aren’t going to make enough money off our writing to change our lives. If that’s the case, how does the author measure their success?

It just so happens that over on Bluesky, a couple of well established authors have been talking about success. Delilah S. Dawson described what it’s like being a career writer right now, and how stressful it is because so much of a writer’s success comes down to luck. All it takes is for the right person to pick up your story at the right time, and suddenly, your dreams are realized. As Delilah puts it, the equation is skill + time + luck. You have control over two of those factors, so keep honing your skills and putting in the time, and hope that luck finds you.

John Scalzi also reiterated how much luck has played a part in his career. He acknowledges that he is an excellent writer, because he is, and he has also been quite fortunate to find his path through the proverbial jungle. He’s recently returned from a trip to Budapest where he received The Grand Prize of Budapest. I think if anyone exemplifies the formula Delila Dawson described, skill + time + luck, it’s John Scalzi.

So, if skill + time + luck = success, what does success look like?

Sometimes, it looks like money. If you’re able to support yourself on your writing alone, I would say you’re successful. If the money you make from your writing pays your way to go to conventions and writing retreats, you are successful. Hell, if it allows you to take the one you love out to a nice meal, that is also success. Writers sink a lot of time into their stories. It’s nice to get paid for that time.

Then again, some writers aren’t looking to publish. Are they not still successful? Jennifer Carson and I had a conversation on this blog 9 years ago about what it is to be a successful writer, and publishing is not necessarily part of that definition. Most people that set out to write a book never get to the end, so simply finishing a story is a huge win.

If you’re looking for a way to measure success, measure it in joy. Does your work make you happy? Are your stories bringing joy to others? Our capitalist society wants you to believe that something only has value if you can put a price tag on it, but that is a lie. There is value in happiness.

I haven’t talked about fame or recognition as measures of success. Not all writers that are recognizable are rich. My buddy Michael Gallowglas is quite popular in many circles, but if you’ve attended any of his live storytelling shows, you’ll know from context that he’s not pulling in Stephen King, George R. R. Martin, or J. K. Rowling money. (If you haven’t attended one of his shows, you should correct that. What I just described is a bit from his show.)

To a certain degree, fame seems more like a curse than a blessing. I remember running briefly into Brandon Sanderson on the ship during Writing Excuses Retreat 2022, and there was a moment of fear in his eyes. We’d met many times before that, and I don’t think he recognized me. He saw that I recognized him though, and he probably thought I was about to mob him like so many of his fans. I gave him a smile and a greeting and kept going, and he visibly relaxed.

Suffice it to say, fame can be a measure of success as an author. For my part, it’s not what I’m looking for.

I’m looking for readers. I want fans of my stories, which sounds a little bit like fame, but I see it differently. I want people to sink into my stories and get immersed, and when they climb out the other side, look around hungrily for the next book. I want to make people feel and think. With The Repossessed Ghost, I want people to be able to escape for a little while and have a fun adventure.

If I measured success only in dollars, I would just focus on the Day Job. I’m well paid for my work as a programmer, and an enormous paycheck would have to arrive for my hourly rate as a writer to come close to comparing to my hourly rate as a programmer. It’s not something I’m ever going to expect.

In summary, you must define for yourself what success looks like as an author. No one else can define it for you. And if you don’t know the answer now, that’s okay, too! Just keep writing, putting in the time.

Yesterday was a lot of fun. Tonight, we’ll come back to reality. What is it actually like to be an author?

Let me begin where I ended yesterday, which is to say every author is different. I can talk about my experiences and relay some of the things I’ve learned speaking to authors at various points on their career. But since every writer is different, every writer’s career is going to be different. Some of us move along similar paths, but what works for one person may or may not work for the next. Also, the profession has changed over time. There is no one-size-fits-all description for the author life.

As part of a presentation I put together for the Day Job, I looked up some numbers about writers. Only around 10% of people that set out to write a book actually finish. Of those, less than 10% publish. I don’t know how many people are able to sustain themselves on their writing career alone, but those numbers are painfully small.

It’s difficult to get into stores. You’re extremely unlikely to write a book that will find its way into a Walmart. It’s relatively easy to get your book onto Amazon with everyone else, but Amazon is only going to promote your book under very specific circumstances.

Like yesterday, let me paint a picture of what the author life is like for most writers.

As an author, you’re going to have a Day Job so that you can pay your bills and stay afloat. You may be passionate about writing, and you may be talented and driven, but the market is fickle and there is no easy guarantee of success. Whether you’ve put out one book or ten, it’s most likely going to be a struggle for you to live a comfortable, stable lifestyle based purely on the sales of your books.

You might have a Patreon. Lots of authors have those, these days. The extra income will help make your financial situation more stable. In fact, if you’re one of the few lucky authors that gets to quit their Day Job, Patreon might be the first step. But if you have your Day Job, don’t quit it just yet. When your job gets in the way of financial gains, you’ll know you’ve reached the point to take the leap.

Time never seems to be on your side. You may be working under a deadline. You might have a family that deserves your attention, or other hobbies that you rely on to maintain your mental stability. Finding a healthy balance is a constant shuffle. The author’s life is just a constant effort to keep all the plates spinning.

Some authors are doing very well. The superstar, ridiculously rich authors are basically lottery winners. You know their names, and there aren’t that many of them. But people that don’t know any better will compare you to their work, whether that comparison is favorable or not. You may dream of attaining their wealth or fame, but chances are, that’s not why you continue to write.

Authors write because that’s what we’ve always done. We enjoy it. We may want to support ourselves on our stories, but if we are wise, we will keep our expectations in check and just keep showing up to do the work.

It is work, by the way. The words don’t always show up on the page without a fight. Some writers make it look easy, but for most of us, we have to dig deep, unpack our adjectives, spelunk our mind palaces, and really push to get the right words to line up in the right order.

Some authors write every day. Good for them. Some write when they can squeeze it into their schedule. Some write for a couple hours at most a day. Some sit down and write until the coffee pot is empty, or when the sun has gone down, or when their spouse finally drags them away from their keyboard because they’ve been at it all day already and damn it, you said you were going to spend some time with me this evening and it’s already getting late.

Authors go long periods of time without getting the feedback they desperately crave. Authors are the camels of the art world, plodding along, carrying their own water, marching through the desert of isolation, hoping to find an oasis of sales and recognition before their resolve gives out.

It doesn’t happen to every author, but most of us forget whatever magic spell we wove in order to produce the previous book. Every time we start a new project, we have to learn how to write that story, because they all demand different nutrients in order to grow and thrive.

No matter how hard we work on a story, there will always be readers that don’t get it. Sometimes the criticism we receive is deserved. Sometimes, when the reader laid eyes on our carefully crafted story, they just weren’t in the mood.

For the most part, the author life is not glamorous. But it really is the life I want. And I’ll keep showing up to work, putting in the hours, because whether the rest of the world sees it or not, it’s who I am.

Today was another rough day. It went longer than it should have, and I still haven’t finished everything I needed to finish for the Day Job. So, tonight, let’s have some fun. Let’s indulge in pure fantasy and dive deep into the most outlandish dreams and notions people project onto the author life.

Authors don’t need to work for a living, really. They don’t need to wake up to an alarm clock. They are not required to go anywhere or do anything special for their job. They make up stories and live like rock stars. Better than rock stars. Musicians usually have to go on tour when they’re not in a studio. Authors can stay at home all the time if they want.

And why wouldn’t they? With the kind of money authors make, they can afford rambling mansions. Laundry? Cooking? Yard care? They have staff that take care of that. Sometimes, the author will spend the day in the pool. Maybe they’ll tinkle around on their grand piano. The writing happens eventually, but that’s really just an afterthought, since it’s so easy. At least, it’s easy for them. They made it where they did because of their gift.

They don’t have to stay at home, though. In fact, taking a year to go eat in Italy, pray in India, and fall in love in Indonesia is such a common activity for authors, they made a book and a movie about it. Traveling the world and seeing all the sites is a requirement for the author because how else will they fill their stories with vivid descriptions? The author life is a jet-setter’s life.

Kids dream of being astronauts, firefighters, or maybe the President of the United States. If they knew what I know, they’d dream of being an author. If you turn on the television and flip through a few channels, you’re sure to land on a based-on-reality show about an author that’s solving mysteries and fighting crime. Jessice Fletcher? Richard Castle? There are others, and it’s a common trope for a reason. Authors see the world differently than regular people, which makes them better at fighting crime than Batman.

Truly, is there anything an author can’t do? I don’t think so.

Obviously, this is why I’m so driven to change careers. I crave that rich lifestyle. It explains why people are interested in using artificial intelligence to write stories for them. If they can just get their foot in the door, surely all that author wealth will just start pouring in.

You basically don’t even need to do anything once you’re an author, you know. Look at George Martin and Pat Rothfuss. No one really believes that they stress over their unfinished work, right? There is no way that the weight of their respective series keeps them up at night. They’re unbothered by the voices of picky fans demanding they “get back to work.” They don’t need to work, anymore. They’re authors.

I cannot stress enough how low stress the author life is. You don’t spend any time whatsoever worrying about what people think of your writing. You move through life with complete confidence, knowing that all of your stories will sell always, and the audience will be there in line for your next book, without fail. Authors know their value. They know they’re the real-deal.

There are some authors that keep writing. Not because they have to, but because they want to. Fortunately for them, since they’ve finished at least one book, they know exactly what they’re doing on the subsequent books. Have you ever heard an author say something along the lines of, “I feel like I’ve completely forgotten how to write”? Me, neither!

Everyone respects authors and the choices they make in their stories. No one ever walks up to an author and says, “You know what you should do in your next story? Let me tell you.” When an author is talking to someone about the story their writing, whether it be a stranger or a loved one, the other person never stops them and asks, “Oh, when’s it coming out?” And authors always have a ready, intelligent answer for the question, “What’s your story about?”

This author experience I have described in great detail is universal and without exception. Any author reading this will back me up and tell you that this is entirely true. Authors either make it or they don’t, and their path to success is the same every time.

You can trust me on this, because if you click on the banner on my blog, or search my name on Amazon, you’ll find that I’m an author. Therefore, I’m something of an authority on this subject.